South Africa has about 700 state-owned enterprises. They function throughout sectors like transport, power and public utilities, and a few are among the many largest employers in these sectors.
Entities like these are created and managed by a rustic’s authorities to offer important companies and drive financial improvement. In South Africa, they have been shaped within the twentieth century, when the federal government recognised the necessity to help native industries by offering companies corresponding to rail transport, financing and electrical energy.
Because the nation industrialised, extra state-owned entities have been established to serve companies and communities and to create jobs. Within the early twenty first century they have been additionally tasked with producing income for the state.
However when South Africa’s state-owned enterprises are talked about in civil society discourse, it is usually for all of the mistaken causes. They’re beset by poor service supply, monetary difficulties and allegations of corruption. Their efficiency has considerably deteriorated prior to now 15 years. Unclear mandates, poor administration, and inadequate infrastructure and assets are among the many causes.
This has overshadowed their potential to contribute to analysis, improvement and innovation which may help financial development.
We on the Centre for Science, Expertise and Innovation Indicators on the Human Sciences Analysis Council have performed analysis to establish what state-owned enterprises must do to bolster analysis and improvement (R&D) and innovation.
We used three state-owned enterprises as case research. They function in numerous sectors: forestry, aviation and power. They have been chosen for his or her obvious innovation by means of R&D or different actions. We recognized 5 methods to evaluate whether or not a state-owned enterprise is prepared and in a position to obtain its goals through R&D and innovation: its human capabilities, technological functionality, collaborations and partnerships, analysis infrastructure and governance.
The three organisations efficiently built-in R&D and innovation into their methods. However enhancements have been wanted within the areas of capability, assets and organisation.
Though state-owned enterprises are distinctive entities, the framework we developed utilizing these 5 areas helped us to know their revolutionary traits as gamers inside a particular sector. It’s a priceless evaluation software that may information particular person state-owned enterprises and policymakers in bettering the enterprises’ R&D and innovation outputs. Finally, this would possibly contribute to financial development and the event of particular sectors.
Case research: a forest of alternatives
The South African Forestry Firm SOC Restricted, based in 1992, was one of many three organisations we studied. It has a twin mandate. One is industrial, centered on timber harvesting, processing and associated actions, each nationally and internationally. The second is socio-economic: to ship returns to its shareholder, the Division of Public Enterprises, whereas selling rural financial improvement.
In South Africa, the corporate manages 189,760 hectares of forest, together with 121,585ha of economic plantation. In Mozambique, it manages 82,547ha of forest; 15,258ha of that is industrial plantation. It processes about 10% of South Africa’s logs and produces over ten million seedlings yearly.
This is how the organisation carried out in 2022 (the yr we performed our analysis) within the 5 evaluation areas.
Human capability: The R&D group makes up lower than 1% of its workforce of about 5,000 folks. The organisation’s coaching academy supplies a variety of programmes for workers and the communities near its operations. It helps capability constructing within the sector by means of postgraduate bursaries.
Technological capability: The organisation’s capacity to make use of R&D and know-how to realize its enterprise targets spans the complete timber worth chain. The organisation additionally has non-timber capabilities. These embrace community-based forestry, coaching and eco-tourism.
Collaboration: There are robust collaborations with universities, analysis councils, communities and world and native organisations. This helps to construct capability and to unravel completely different operational issues. It additionally grows relationships with communities.
Analysis infrastructure: The corporate conducts R&D at its nursery in Tweefontein within the Western Cape province and R&D centre at Sabie in Mpumalanga province. As an illustration, timber tissue tradition analysis is finished on the centre to enhance lumber yields over time. The centre has state-of-the-art gear and extra is being sourced.
Governance: The organisation recognises the significance of R&D and continues to spend money on it. An innovation portfolio is a part of its government construction. Nevertheless, it hasn’t achieved its capital funding targets. It additionally doesn’t have methods for mental property administration or know-how switch.
Room for enchancment
All three of our case research had made R&D and innovation actions a part of their strategic planning. Additionally they had clear examples of revolutionary efficiency and did effectively when it got here to collaboration.
Nonetheless, there was plenty of room for enchancment. All three entities wanted to rent extra researchers and technicians. All three additionally face the problem of utilizing the technological data and programs they’ve developed over years in the direction of producing revenue from innovation. This may be finished by means of commercialising mental property.
Analysis infrastructure is an space of concern for all three entities. They want extra long-term funding. We additionally discovered that long-standing R&D programmes wanted to be refreshed. Extra proactive approaches to innovation and the commercialisation of mental property may assist.
Going ahead
We consider that our evaluation and the ensuing indicators can be utilized by all South African state-owned enterprises to evaluate what they should obtain extra R&D and innovation. It is a software for them to trace their progress in turning into extra revolutionary, and going past their core service supply mandates.
Jacqueline Borel-Saladin, Senior Analysis Specialist, Centre for Science, Expertise and Innovation Indicators (CeSTII), Human Sciences Analysis Council
Nazeem Mustapha, Chief Analysis Specialist, Human Sciences Analysis Council